I really like the style that M.E. Kemp uses when writing. I feel like her style is very unique! “There are evil people in this to town who would be only too happy to stomp the Mather name in the mud. Great men have enemies, Cousin Hetty, and while I am only a tiny gnat, my father is a giant among men." The way that she explains that giant men have enemies, and that her father is a giant indicated that her father has a lot of enemies. I like the way that she points out all of her information. She explains by not explaining. She points you in the right direction, instead of giving you all the information. "I nodded, taking care to keep my expression serious. I ignored the face that Creasy made at me, wrinkling up his nose and his eyes in distaste." The way that she describes the wrinkeled face in distaste sort of gives me a vivid detail of a man with a sour look on his face while squinting his eyes. I find her writing very descriptive, and I really do enjoy reading her pieces. I find it interesting that much of what she writes is not very direct, and she tends to lead you. She lets you sort of create your own scene by giving you the correct details to create a detailed surrounding. I really do enjoy M.E Kemp's writing
-Do you think that leading people without giving direct desccriptions creates more of a vivid read?
-Do you intend to make readers think about the metaphors you use?
1/6 Speaker=(**** stars)
No comments:
Post a Comment